As Seen in Anchin’s Real Estate Year-End Tax Planning Guide
Under current law, the individual estate tax exemption is increased each year based on an inflation assumption. In 2024, the first $13.61 million of an individual’s estate is exempt from federal estate tax.
If you are a married couple splitting gifts, the effective exemption amount is $25.84 million. This amount is reduced by any gifts made in excess of the annual gift tax exclusion in a given year. In 2024, individuals can make gifts of up to $18,000 to any other individual with no gift tax consequences.
Any gifts in excess of that amount will reduce the lifetime gift and estate tax exemption. The exemption is scheduled to be reduced by half in two years or sooner through new legislation. A few estate tax planning techniques you may want to consider are as follows:
* Planning opportunity: Note that the amount of principal not received as part of an annuity payment will be subject to a current gift tax. Since the amount is not considered a present interest (meaning beneficiaries do not have immediate use of the money), the amount will not be eligible for the gifting exclusion. Why not use a “zeroed-out GRAT” structure so that the value of the gift transferred to the beneficiary is zero?
* Planning opportunity: Instead of setting up one GRAT to house all transferred assets, why not set up multiple GRATs to house different asset types – some conservatively invested and others with more risk? The winners, or appreciated GRATs, do their job of transferring wealth to the next generation; the losers collapse, as if the GRAT for these assets never took place. In the end, all GRATs should have an economic purpose and have some risk exposure. Also, varying the beneficiaries and trust start dates may be advisable.
Transferring a real estate property into a trust as part of an estate plan, where the value of the property exceeds the available exemption could result in gift tax due. Instead of gifting the property to the trust, sell the property to a grantor trust in exchange for a down payment and a promissory note.
Under current tax rules, the grantor and the grantor trust are considered the same, and transactions between them are ignored: there is no income tax gain recognized when the assets are sold to a grantor trust, and no interest income needs to be recognized as interest is paid back on the note. There is no gift when the value of the promissory note matches the value of the assets.
This arrangement allows an individual to move appreciating assets to the trust in exchange for a note (repaid in cash) and some interest. Further, the note can be structured as interest-only with a balloon payment at the end of the term.
An individual effectively exchanges the appreciating assets for cash and reduces the future value of his taxable estate. To make this work, the trust must have sufficient assets to justify the borrowing (10% of the purchase price is common) and this amount could be gifted to the trust if necessary (which would require some available gift exemption).
Finally, an appraisal is required to support the value of the assets sold, which could possibly show lower valuations because of the current economy and valuation discounts.
As part of the estate planning process, thought should be given to liquidity. That is, what will be the source of funds for the payment of estate tax? For those with significant holdings of illiquid assets, such as real estate and art, these assets will be subject to estate tax, but may not be easily sold. More importantly, it may not be opportune or desirable to dispose of these assets, and even if there was a decision to sell, the ability to have proceeds available to pay the tax within nine months of death, when it is due, could be problematic. Life insurance may provide a solution. There are planning opportunities with insurance and creative structures available to fund policies that are efficient without placing high demands on current cash flow.
The Spousal Lifetime Access Trust serves to utilize an historically high lifetime gift tax exemption, while still providing the ability, should the need arise, to access the gifted assets. To illustrate the concept, suppose Spouse A creates a trust for the benefit of the other spouse, Spouse B, and possibly their children. The trust allows for distributions to Spouse B during such spouse’s lifetime, after which time the trust continues for the benefit of the children. Spouse B would create a similar trust for the benefit of Spouse A and the children. In good times, the couple would use and enjoy assets outside the SLATs. But should there be a reversal of fortune in the lives of A and B, there is the ability for them to receive distributions from the trusts for their benefit. While any such distributions would bring assets into the estate that were previously removed, this would be done only where there was a real need for these assets.
The income from a SLAT is taxable to the creator of the trust, whether or not there are distributions to beneficiaries. The creator’s payment of the trust’s tax might seem like an additional gift to the trust, but IRS rules do not count it as such, making this feature an added benefit.
This strategy also allows for the trusts to continue after the death of the beneficiary spouse for the benefit of the children and grandchildren, who may receive distributions from the trust during their lifetimes. In this case, it is possible to avoid having the trust taxed in the estate of these beneficiaries upon their deaths, providing the creator of the trust with the opportunity to do multi-generational planning.